Opinion

Fanboy Fanaticism – The Brand Strikes Back

Published: July 6th, 2012 by The Edge Observer 17

Article by Dan Jackson, Bladereviews.com

The Brand Strikes Back

Illustration by Jean-Phillippe Thivierge

As a regular reader of the excellent every day carry gear blog Every Day Commentary I have come to greatly enjoy Anthony’s reviews, his insights, and his sometimes controversial musings on all things EDC. One such controversial musing was a relatively recent post entitled “Fanboy Futility” that touched on the subject of branding, and its involvement (or lack thereof) in the gear review and general purchasing process.

Anthony starts off the article innocently enough, advocating that fanboyism, a phenomena where one blindly follows a particular brand without any objectivity at all, has no place when it comes to the rational discussion of knives and tools. I couldn’t agree more. No doubt fanboyism is inherently stupid, and shouldn’t be tolerated in any form if a rational discussion on gear is to be had. I think the majority of folks (ardent fanboys excepted) can agree on that one.

What I found a little more interesting was Anthony’s concept of being “brand agnostic,” that is, to be completely blind to branding and maintain that as both a consumer, and a reviewer, that brand has no place in his purchasing decision. Anthony argues that branding is merely a gimmick companies use to sell more product, presumably for some nefarious reasons (eg, for the promotion of reactionary and blind fanboy-esque purchasing decisions) and therefore should be to be ignored. It’s an interesting concept, and noble in intention, but can we ever really claim to be brand agnostic? I almost liken it to comedian Stephen Colbert’s declaration “I’m color blind, I don’t see race.” The only difference being in Stephen’s case it’s said with tongue firmly in cheek as part of a reoccurring punch line in the show.

Now I’m a big believer in meritocracies, but I’m also a realist. And frankly, I don’t think humans are capable of completely ignoring branding, despite how good intentioned and strong willed you are to do so. Furthermore, I’m not convinced branding is necessarily a bad thing either.

Knife Brands

First of all, if brands weren’t so tremendously effective companies wouldn’t spend trillions of dollars on them every year. But even if we ignore that little wrinkle it is still impossible to avoid how marketing permeates every single aspect of our lives on both conscious and subconscious levels. To shrug such signals would require the focus of a monk, and perhaps even the lifestyle of one. Today if you walk outside, turn on a tv, check your email, stare absently at your smartphone, step into a store, or even meet a new person, you are constantly and continually assaulted by marketing. People and companies desperately vying to sell you things. So how did we let things get this way? Marketing as we know it is actually a fairly recent phenomena, a byproduct of capitalism and the industrial revolution combined with a healthy post WW2 economic boom. Suddenly people had money, and factories were there to create new and exciting ways to spend it. So it only made sense mass-market these mass-manufactured goods. I’m sure many find it offensive, the nerve of this capitalistic machine, but to this day it remains completely and utterly inescapable.

So why the emphasis on brands? Brands act as signals, shortcuts allowing us to sift through the information overload and organize data in a way that is coherent and readily accessible. We attach meaning to brands, messages often carefully crafted by the companies that create them. Close your eyes for a second and think of Apple, of Cadillac, maybe McDonalds or Microsoft. You may find that all kinds of thoughts, images, sounds, smells, and even emotions come to mind. You may open your eyes and actually feel different having briefly come in contact with these brands.

But hey, don’t put that tinfoil hat on just yet, it’s not all bad – especially if the message of the company’s brand is consistent with your expectations. Just imagine being trapped in a grocery store in a world without branding. All the packages look the same, aisles of non-descript foodstuffs in plain brown boxes with sterile lettering. It’s like something out of 1984. I guess you could just buy whatever is cheapest, or perhaps even look at the ingredients on the label, but honestly, who has the time to evaluate every single ingredient solely on the merits every single trip to the store? Go ahead and roll the dice; who knows what kind of gelatinous delight will slide out of that tin, or what sort of cereal comes tumbling forth from that box into your waiting bowl. If you don’t like what you picked out, well, you can always roll the dice again the next time the pantry grows bare. The connections between product and manufacturer remain absent, and perhaps even the idea of true choice also fades off into the mist.

The Brand Strikes Back

Illustration by Jean-Phillipe Thivierge

So I think branding does have it’s place if it communicates the right message that reinforces your expectations. It can help connect you with the right kind of products and can do so in a relatively painless and efficient manner. Naturally branding it isn’t a perfect system, and a shiny brand can certainly fail to deliver, but as your perceptions sour so does the brand’s reputation. After all, a customer scorned is far more likely to voice their opinion than a satisfied one. So if a company is generally doing a bad job upholding their end of the bargain then the world is going to hear about it. It’s a feedback loop that iterates much faster than a single person’s experience – it is the aggregate experience of all the consumers and it moves at the speed of information.

In the end I totally agree, judging items on there merits is of the utmost importance, and succumbing to fanboyism is utterly stupid. But the fact remains that without good branding many worthy items will never find their way into your hands in first place; the signal to noise ratio in our modern world is simply way too high. It is unfortunate that companies must expend all these funds on marketing, since it indubitably raises the price of the goods, but companies chalk it up as a cost of doing business. And as a guy who has drank the kool-aid and seen the light, I humbly suggest that you do the same.


Good Luck Defeating The Red Army With Your CQC-7, Mate

Published: June 27th, 2012 by The Edge Observer 17

Where I with tact aim to explain why we should not call our knives “tactical”.

Article by David Lew

Tactical knife cartoon

Illustration : Jean-Phillippe Thivierge

It seems nowadays everything can be branded “tactical”. Log onto any internet shop catering to the soldier, gun owner or general outdoors person and you will find everything from trousers (pants), shirts, socks, gloves, load-bearing equipment, boots and pens with a “tactical” prefix. I believe this illustrates the point well : http://www.511tactical.com/All-Products/Bags-Backpacks/Business-Tactical.html

In the middle of the last decade when I was a young ‘un who was still being bossed around by my betters in basic and later NCO-school, we learnt the definitions of “battle/combat technique”, “strategy” and “tactics” as used by our armed forces. Since then I have ingested much malt-based drink and forgotten a lot of things but I’m fairly sure my socks/shorts/shirt were not discussed. Now that I think of it, neither was my knife of choice.

Let us be honest here, those of us who read this buy more knives than we need. We may be users, we might study them in detail but first and foremost we are collectors. Nothing to be ashamed of, everyone collects something (even if it’s empty bottles or credit card bills). We buy knives because they interest us; we buy them because they speak to us. We buy them due to clever marketing by the people who make them.

I believe the term “tactical” in general, is just such a marketing rouse and I will aim to show you all why that is the case. We’ll get to the specific topic of folding knives later. But I digress. Let’s talk about the products themselves.

“Tactical” knives come in all shapes and sizes. For the sake of this article I will divide them into the following general categories:

Fixed blade utility/field knives

[Sometimes known as “combat knives” when you order them from dodgy catalogues and men at shows who while not part of any regulated armed forces wear military pattern clothing every day]

Most, if not all armed forces will have one type of common blade used for opening boxes, cutting up food, light field craft and a bit of stabbing enemies on the side. Bayonets, Ka-Bars, Kukris and Puukkos are all fixed bladed utility/field knives.

Mora fixed blade utility knife

Fixed blade Utility

Folding utility/field knives

The classic Swiss Army Knife is perhaps the best example of this kind of blade, but modern soldiers are often found carrying folders from Spyderco, Benchmade, SOG and many other manufacturers. Used for much the same tasks as the fixed blade utility/field knife, in my experience more often than not privately procured according to the users personal taste.

Folding utility knives (Top, Wegner Swiss Army. Bottom, Benchmade Mini Griptilian). Photo, David Lew

Folding Utility Knives

Dedicated Fighting Knife

Fairbairn and Sykes designed their commando dagger for hand to hand combat, specifically stabbing fools in the ear. There are also many other examples of this with one being the Karambit-style knife and another being the TDI by Ka-Bar. They can be found in both folding and fixed blade varieties.

Extrema Ratio Puggio

Dedicated Fighting Knife, Extrema Ratio Puggio

That Knife

For some people* “general issue”, “good enough”, “common” or “regular” will not do. Thankfully for them Emerson knives make their innovative folders and Mick Strider makes his meaty slabs of metal wrapped in cord or G10. They are usually very competent tools made from the finest materials and set trends in the wider civilian knife world. Knives in this category come in all the above flavors but they are more special than your “regular” knife. Why? Because they cost a fortune and they make their owners happier than all the beer in Bavaria ever could.

Rockstead TEI

Luxury knife maker Rockstead’s TEI-S DLC

[Apart from the above blades there is perhaps the most used military blade out there – the one you find on the humble multi-tool as made by Leatherman, Gerber and Victorinox. As I have yet to see one labelled as “tactical” I will refrain from discussing them but have no doubt about it; if you want a blade that’s used by military folks (AKA “Operators”) all over the world every day – this is what you want.]

All of these categories come from high-end to low-end. Steel choice is a jungle with everything from 1095 Carbon to SGPS (Super Gold Powder Stainless) found in full tang, stick tang, and partial tang blades with handles ranging from synthetic polymer AKA “FRN”, “G10”, “Kraton”, “Thermorun” (all fancy names for “plastic”, really) to natural (wood, bone, horn, leather) via every single metal from aluminum and titanium to unobtainium (sorry, that last bit is what Oakley uses to make their “tactical” gloves [TACTICAL GLOVES?!]). Some of them are great knives, some of them are good knives and some of them are downright poor efforts.

I fear, however, that I struggle to find a single attribute that unites all of these different tools. What makes them “tactical” other than the fact that the very word seems to be a catch phrase in a western cultural sphere that has been at war for more than a decade? Kyle Defoor, a bona fide “operator” (AKA “proper military bloke who’s been there, done that and shot them in the groin several times”) if there ever was one, wrote a great piece on the 5.11 “tactical” trouser.

The point raised in Kyles’ blog post, is that the term “tactical” in relation to trousers is empty to the point that users will fill it with whatever vague idea they have. This also applies to socks, boots, pens, sporks, stoves and yes, even our beloved blades.

Kyle Defoors’ post: http://www.kyledefoor.com/2011/10/brief-history-of-tactical-pants.html

So let us call our tools/collectibles what they are: Fixed and folding utility/field knives, fighting knives and exclusive production/custom knives. Call it a “combat knife”, a “heavy duty folder” or use the prefix “military” if you must. None have anything to do with small unit, large unit or indeed, squad level tactics.

So let’s agree, for the sake of the argument, that it’s quite silly to bunch all of the above categories into a single genre be it “tactical”, “combat” or “military”. But what about “tactical” folders? Surely that name is decent and proper? Not so.

If we travel into the dark depths of the past, to a time where the Madonna did not steal all the babies of Africa and still kept the Catholic faith, where Tom Cruise was more famous for kicking ass/taking names/playing volleyball in Top Gun than jumping on Oprahs’ couch/being crazy. We will find ourselves in the mythical times known only as “the 80’s”. It was in this dark time that bladesmiths of rank such as Bob Terzuola, Michael Walker, Chris Reeve, Sal Glesser, Ernie Emerson and many others defined what we now consider to be the modern folding knife.

Slowly but surely folding knives evolved from slip-joints and back-locks that you opened with two hands and stored in a sheath (such as the Buck 110) to the marvels of design and technology we carry around every day.

In his book “The Tactical Folding Knife” Mr. Terzuola, arguably the “father of the tactical folder” defines it as “…one that can constantly be carried in a legal, comfortable and easily accessible manner…must have a provision for rapid deployment such as a hols, stud or disc…finishes to the blade, materials from which they are made and decorative embellishments, I believe are of no real consequence to the definition to the definition of a tactical folder.” He rounds it off by stating: “While this definition is probably incomplete, it does reflect accurately my concept of the tactical folding knife and does describe the majority of knives being sold as such today.”

Now walk into your local knife shop or check in with your favourite web-based dealer. The attributes that mr. Terzuola stated defined the “tactical” folder are now found in almost every new folding knife, even those made by companies that previously made more traditional offerings. You can today get a Buck, Kershaw or Swiss Army Knife that according to the old rules would be “tactical”.

We have to remember that the term was coined more than 20 years ago in a time when the concealed carry of firearms was rare, even in the US of A, and the last big war the West had taken part in en masse was Korea. Today what used to be “tactical” is just “ordinary” in folding knives the same way trousers with cargo pockets or trench coats used to be considered “military” but today are just regular clothes. What in the year 2000 might have been rightly called a “tactical folder” I would today call a “modern folding knife”. My EDC, a BM556 in blue, might fulfill Mr. Terzuola’s criteria but I’d feel silly calling it a tactical knife.

In short: “Tactical” is a cool word today and it was without a doubt a great way to separate the new wave of folding one-hand-openers (OHOs) from your dad’s Buck 110 back in 1990. Today it’s an empty term overused by a community used to more than a decade of war. In fact, if you want to keep your defensive/fighting knife à jour with modern mil-speak you should probably call it your “kinetic” knife (don’t, it’ll make you sound like a numpty**). Compare this with other “cool” prefixes; the way makers in the 70s-90s put “survival” on anything with a serrated/combo edge and put serrated/combo edges on things that never should have had them.

To put it simply (some infantrymen know how to read after all):
A low-yield nuclear warhead is tactical; your brand new Benchmade 580BK Barrage is not.

To put it even simpler (some of us find “nuclear” too big of a word):
You would never call your magazine/radio/admin pouch just a “tactical” pouch, would you?

Don’t cut yourself

- David Lew

Notes:

*Call them geardos, the Gucci-crowd, flash-operators, the shiny professionals, discerning consumers or what you will. All units and crowds have them and they range from the Doritos-eating champion to the PT god, from actual navy SEALs who spend their working lives slaying tangos in Durkadurkastan to guys that get mistaken for Shamoo the Orca on a regular basis. All knife-collectors in the service are at least halfway there (we all have that guy in our platoon who can blow an entire months’ pay on gear) and most knife-collectors in the general population have a fetish for at least one “Gucci”-brand be it CRK, Emerson, Strider or your custom maker of choice. I am not talking about “mall-ninjas” here, these are people with huge amounts of knowledge and highly advanced skills of quality spotting/a penchant for the exclusive.

*Numpty (noun) = British English for a grade A moron.